Ethical Dilemma #5: Peninsula Farms and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency


 WEEK 5: PENINSULA FARMS 



Peninsula Farms was a small business in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, that began with one cow.  The Joneses owned the cow and kept her around to maintain their lawn.  The cow produced milk, of course, but the Joneses didn't know how to milk her.  So they learned proper milking techniques.  The cow was producing more milk than they could use, and the surplus was going to waste.  The Joneses researched the local market to find out what kind of milk product they would sell.  They discovered that whole-milk yogurt was in demand.  They then found out how to make yogurt in large batches.  They also studied the health and safety regulations to make sure they were meeting government standards.  The Joneses were so successful that they exceeded the government criteria.  The Joneses then bought more cows -- enough to make Peninsula Farms a profitable business.

Government inspectors had always given Peninsula Farms a high rating on their regular inspections.  It was a surprise to the Joneses, then, when six federal inspectors from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) visited the farm and, with just a cursory examination of the plant and its procedures, impounded more than $50 000 worth of yogurt.  This halted the production and left Peninsular Farms customers without product they wanted to buy.  The Joneses faced a total loss of more than $100 000 as they were now behind $50 000 worth of new production in addition to the yogurt that had been impounded.  (Their cooler was full of the impounded yogurt and there was nowhere to put any new yogurt.)  They were losing sales and customers as well.  The space that Peninsula Farms' product took on grocery shelves was soon filled with competing brands.  Faced with such a loss, Peninsula Farms was forced out of business.  It was discovered after the fact that their plant was above standard and their yogurt tested totally clean, with no trace of offending bacteria.

No one wants to be poisoned by the foods we eat.  The Canadian Inspection Agency does a wonderful job of protecting us from dirty factories, unsafe packaging, and dangerous storage practices.  As a result, we eat foods that do not, as a rule, make us sick.  Canadians are grateful that the CIFA is diligent in their efforts on our behalf.  However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
If you were the Joneses, would you start over?  Explain your decision.



****Please read the article below before answering this post****



Idealism and yogurt

    New York professor of Spanish literature and management consultant find niche market making yogurt in rural Nova Scotia

Published: The Globe and Mail, August 14, 1989, Report on Business
By Deborah Jones

    Ask Sonia Jones what makes an entrepreneur tick, and she will wax poetic about the main character in Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra's seventeenth-century masterpiece Don Quixote de la Mancha. ''I love his willingness to go forth and tackle every problem,'' said the practical-looking Ms Jones, chairman and chief executive of Peninsula Farms Ltd. of Lunenburg, N.S., a maker of all-natural yogurt, frozen yogurt and ice cream.

    Don Quixote, an adventurous country gentleman addled with idealism, ''wanted his life to be useful to others: orphans, widows in need, damsels,'' she enthused.

    What have such altruistic notions to do with running a business such as Peninsula Farms , which employs 42 and sells $2.7-million worth of dairy products in the three Maritime provinces each year?

    ''The love of living and learning and helping and doing is part of the entrepreneurial spirit,'' Ms Jones said.

    She and her husband, Gordon Jones, were well-to-do New Yorkers when they moved to Nova Scotia in 1972 in search of an academic job for her and uncrowded sailing room for him. Ms Jones, a Harvard-trained professor of Spanish literature, found a job at Dalhousie University. The pair eventually settled with their two small daughters on a farm in pastoral Lunenburg on Nova Scotia's south shore.

    Starting a new business was the furthest thing from their minds. Ms Jones was happily teaching students about her first love and specialty, Cervantes. Mr. Jones had left the corporate world far behind when he retired as a management consultant.

    But then Daisy came along, and Peninsula Farms - the tale of which Ms Jones has set out in her book It All Began With Daisy - inadvertently began.

    Daisy was a Jersey cow the family acquired to have a supply of milk. However, she produced far too much milk for them to use. Ms Jones began making yogurt from the excess and then, on the suggestion of a friend, started selling some to health food stores in Halifax.

    One day David Sobey, then president of Sobeys Stores Ltd., which operates a chain of supermarkets in the Atlantic region, came calling. He told Ms Jones that if she cared to produce her yogurt more commercially he would be willing to stock it. The couple considered the offer, and decided to take him up on it - on condition he allow them to expand lowly.

    Today, the Jones's products are sold throughout the region. Peninsula Farms yogurt holds a 25 per cent share of the Maritime yogurt market, Ms Jones said, and this year the company introduced all-natural ice cream.

    She has also written a yogurt cookbook, which went on sale this year, and is working on a proposal by a Nova Scotia film production company to turn her book about Daisy into a movie.

    Peninsula Farms has not been entirely a story of adventurous romance, the likes of which Cervantes would have relished. Although they now draw a healthy salary, the Jones's did not pay themselves for eight years and, at times, their personal possessions were used as collateral for business loans.

    Indeed, the company would not have endured ''if there hadn't been this spirit of adventure and this desire to live life in a vital way, and if we both hadn't enjoyed this whimsical adventure,'' Ms Jones said.

    She relishes the idea of being an entrepreneur and teaches a course in entrepreneurism at Acadia University in Wolfville, N.S., although she is not entirely convinced that an entrepreneurial spirit can be taught.

    ''Unless you have a sense of humor and a touch of whimsy and an incredible willingness to work yourself very hard, and you have a certain willingness to take risks, you're not likely, even if you want to be an entrepreneur, to pursue it to the end.'' Ironically, Ms Jones appreciates Nova Scotia precisely because it seems to have fewer born entrepreneurs than her native United States. ''I find myself really loving Nova Scotia because it isn't grubby-grabby. . . . You need a middle ground between California crass materialism or pure drudgery,'' she said.

    And what of Daisy, with whom it all began and whose likeness is part of the Peninsula Farm logo? The cow is probably in yogurt heaven now.

    In 1981, the Jones's sold their herd and began purchasing raw milk from Farmers co-operative dairy. Daisy, who would be about 18 years old now, was auctioned off as just one of many lot numbers.

    ''We lost track of Daisy. We didn't know she was going to be famous when we sold her,'' Ms Jones said ruefully.


Copyright Deborah Jones 1989

Comments

  1. First of all, I think Canadian Inspection Agency played a irreplacable role of keeping Canadian's life safer. However, according to the situation described above, they was too diligent this time. The food rule has specific details while there isn't any evidence showing products from Peninsula Farms offense the rule. As a result, Canadian Inspection Agency shouldn't impound the operation of this farm since it's unfair to ban those yogurts. On the other hand, if I were the Joneses, I would start over but I want to have rights of business that I deserve to have. Starting a new business and stoping an old business aren't as easy as saying. Also, if I can't find the real reason of why my products aren't meeting the expectation, my next farm may have the same ending as Peninsula Farms. Furthermore, there needs to be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses because the impact of stoping trades is huge and it's difficult for these companies to continue when they are interrupted.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Canadian inspection agency is a very important part of our economy and they were just trying to do there job in this situation but they needed, to be more careful before making drastic decisions. If i were the Jones I would seek legal action to get the money back because this is ridiculous that an agency could detrimentally ruin a perfectly legal company and small business just due to an error and I think that obviously we need to have a better way of dealing with these instances.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree with your comment and i feel that CFIA was in the wrong in bankrupting a small business. I feel that there should be compensation and/or some form of legal action.

      Delete
    2. I agree with your point, but sometimes people are content with what happened and roll with the new opportunities. Not everyone likes to take legal actions but maybe the Jones will.

      Delete
    3. they lost 100 thousand for some reason i dont think you would want to just forget about that money and move on..,

      Delete
    4. Money is quite important for individual, but when the problem came to food safety what really matters is the masses.

      Delete
    5. Magnus, I think both the points you brought up are very important and both very valid. I also think that the Jones should take legal action to get their money back because their business got ruined because of a mistake like you said, and also I really liked the point you brought up about that we obviously need a better way of dealing with these instances.

      Delete
    6. I agree with your point because there isn't any evidence showed what is exactly wrong with those products and the company lost thousands of dollars with a bad reputation. Maybe people think being unfair to healthy products is better than being blind to all products including low quality things, but it's also too difficult for every individual business to move on when they lost so much. I think Canadian Inspection Agency need to focus on which product is absolutely harmful to people and proves the truth to the society.

      Delete
  3. This is something that has been placed on our economy and businesses since the beginning. What the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has done for us is while although is important to us in how it makes sure that our food is safe to eat, not contaminated, etc. But it can go a bit over the edge when it comes to managing amount of it and supply like how in the news article, it mentions that since the Joneses's cow was producing more milk than a normal limit, and the the rest of it was just being thrown away and soon became a profitable business. But then CFIA, came and impounded them $50,000 on yogurt from them. In this case, if I were them, I would either restart the business an do something different from now on in order to avoid that same or another similar kind of mistakes, or take this as a mistake and improve on the current business to make sure that nothing like that will ever happen while still being a profitable business. I also think that we should need rules for small ventures because one simple wrong move can do a lot to one's company/business or even something else like another company or organization attacking it can make their company forced out of business while being replaced with other ones. As with them and other groups getting in the way of theirs or interrupting theirs, can be hard for them to keep up with them and for their own business to. I would also say that despite what Peninsula farms have gone through, I still think that they still had some success before the business was closed. like how the second article mentions that the Jones's products were still being sold throughout the region and how Peninsula farms yogurt holds up to 25% of the percent share of the Maritime yogurt market.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe that the CFIA was in the wrong as they shouldn't of impounded their yogurt but instead confiscated there yogurt for testing. The CFIAs job is the right thing as is protects many Canadians from food related illnesses however their way in investigation is wrong. If they had been instructed to destroy the existing batch they could've continued production and it wouldn't of forced them to lose their marked share. The shear amount of yogurt impounded is irrelevant the company was more than capable to produce more yogurt and keep their costumer base. On top of this the joneses products were still being sold throughout the Maritimes so therefore there profit should've still been enough to prevent them from going under. I feel that this was a lesson that the CFIA can learn and i feel that they did and from then they changed the way in which they conduct there investigations. The investigations of small scaled businesses should be conducted differently from large scale businesses as they don't have the ability to overcome such setbacks. The farm should've been compensated for the agencies mistake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree with you and I think CFIA needs to change the way to deal with small businesses in order to make sure that they do not destroy a brand.

      Delete
  5. The CFIA did their jobs and saw unsafe products and they recalled them. But as the text says the Jones' were very good at keeping up to standards that the government has made. I think that if they could somehow find a way to quickly make just a little bit more yogurt they could have salvaged the business and keep more of their consumers and therefore saved the business. I think it is still plausible for the Jones family to restart their once great venture. They would need to restart making large numbers of yogurt to fill that once great fanbase. However they could start off small then rapidly multiply the production. I believe perhaps the "punishment" could have been a little lighter. 50,000 dollars is quite a lot of money especially for a small business.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I liked how your reasons were stated in an optimistic way as it seemed that this something that's quite easy recovering from it and starting at a new point to get back what has been lost. I also agree with your points on what the Jones can do to be back running in business again and what the CFIA should have done instead of what they originally did as it seems a better solution for both the Jones family and the CFIA.

      Delete
    2. I very much agree with what your saying about how the joneses could make a very good comeback into the business and agin bak there money.

      Delete
  6. The CFIA can be a really big help when it comes to keeping food clean. They are an asset to the Canadian economy and the health of many Canadians lies within the decisions of the CFIA. However I believe that sometimes they can be a little too quick to judge. In the case of the Jones, so much of their product was quarantined that it caused the company to go bankrupt. They were presented with the opportunity to start selling their product again and pretty much start over. When the CFIA told them not to sell that batch of yogurt the Jones were presented with no space to create a new shipment therefore causing the bankruptcy. I belive that if the CFIA is going to quarantine that much of a product they should help the company by taking the bad batch or moving it out of the way or something to help prevent a company from losing space and preventing sales. The incident was tragic but hopefully everyone learned from the mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think Canadian Food Inspection Agency did good, without them, we cannot have health food, and it will be a series problem, I cannot imagine a country with unhealthy food. It can help Canadians a lot, we do not need to go to hospital every day, overall, there do not have a lot of small farm like joneses’. In the other side, if I were joneses, I will keep do something about yogurt, because I have more experience. And I will do more to supervise my product, try my best do not have mistaken. But if something happen like this happen, I will find someone else test my product and prove it is ok. And I also think that CFIA should provide a new rule for small companies, because they do not have time and money overcome the problem like this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you Sam. The CFIA did right and there aren't many small farms. Shutting them down is to make sure people have healthy food to eat.

      Delete
    2. I would have to disagree, in the govt abuse of power is something that is very common even in the smallest of circumstances and the CIFA could've easily abused it and just ruined the business for no reason at all. Although, I l do agree with the point you brought up about making a rule for small companies

      Delete
    3. Probably I disagree with your point here. We all know that Canadian Inspection Agency wants to keep us from low quality food, which we appreciate that. However, they should also be considering about what the company they shut down feels if the company isn't as unethical as they believe. For example, they didn't tell this farm what to improve and what to change. In another word, if this farm has a chance to reopen, they will possibly make the same mistake as before. Also, they can't let companies to lose too much if they don't have specific evidences. A company is hard to build and operate while nothing is wrong with their product so it's unfair.

      Delete
  8. In my opinion, what the CIFA did was horrible since they completely ruined the business of Peninsula Farms. Yes, the CIFA is good for us and they were only doing their job but I feel like they ruined these people's lives for nothing. In this case, I do believe they were too diligent since nobody eating their product was getting sick, and there was no proof of anything wrong, I feel like they ruined their company for nothing, They could've gotten a sample instead of the whole cooler. They forced these people out of a job by making the company waste all this money for nothing. I definitely think there should be a rule for companies such as peninsula farms that cannot afford something like this. The CIFA made their company crash and that is not right. They cannot go around ruining all the small local businesses. If I were the Jones I would definitely start over because what else can you do? In the world you can't sit around waiting for miracles to happen. There was a huge inconvenience but will doing nothing help? Nah, if the Jones want to make a successful business they have to start again and maybe sue the CIFA in their case and if they're lucky they'll get some money off of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your reasons about how the CIFA did the wrong thing to the businesses of the Peninsula Farms and were too diligent in this case. Because of what they did, forced them out of business and losing all of their money/profits. With something like this, I don't think anyone would let this continue to drag out and either restart and try to improve on their new business or even possibly file a complaint and even sue them in an attempt to regain some money back.

      Delete
    2. Your points are compelling and I agree what they did was a little much since no one was getting ill. What should the CFIA have done?

      Delete
  9. I think the Canadian Food Inspection Agency did right. It is their duty to protect us from dirty factories, unsafe packaging, and dangerous storage practices. They shut down factories that have certain hidden dangers. I believe Peninsula Farms must have some hidden dangers, otherwise the CFIA won’t halted their production and impound all the products. The CFIA is the authority, what matters to them is the masses. If Peninsula Farms really has food safety problems, closing it in advance will protect countless people. However, next time the CFIA should examine more carefully before shutting the factories down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with your statement and can`t find a bit wrong and I especially agree with the part of Peninsula Farms have some problem because they wouldnt do anything for no reason

      Delete
    2. I agree with your point on how they did the right thing, do you think they could have gone about it in a different way then making the jones lose $50,000?

      Delete
    3. I strongly agree with your reasoning on how the CFIA do there work ad help keep us safe, but they shouldn't of been that harsh on the Joneses.

      Delete
    4. I like your point on the hidden danger of Peninsula farm but the CFIA as being said is impounded their product with a brief look, so they might be too diligent on this.

      Delete
  10. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) were harsh with the Joneses, by sending more inspectors to the farm than the usual two that are supposed to be sent. Firstly, they already made the cut for the first two inspectors on their farms. The agency should create a rule about having more inspectors, unless there is a problem that needs to be solved. For the Joneses, they didn’t deserve an extra 6 inspectors in the end. If I was them I would start over with the milk farm again, because they need the money to get back on track. Also, to prove a point to the agency that their farm is safe and doesn’t need more than two inspectors to be cleared.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like your point. Restarting isn't a bad idea, sometimes it works to restart and sometimes it doesn't.

      Delete
  11. Based on the fact that Canadian Food Inspection Agency impounded more than $50 000 worth of yogurt by visiting the farm with just a brief examination of the plant and its procedures, we can say that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is too diligent this time. From my perspective, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency could observe the brand for a week or so and do a market research for the yogurt, if the response is good, then it can potentially prove that the yogurt is healthy and harmless. They were losing sales and customers because of it too, so their competitors have taken their entire market share, also their fame has gone. For small ventures that cannot afford big interruption in their businesses, the CFIA should not impounded all of their products because it is unfair to what they have achieved already, so a compromise should be that a market research should be done and a small amount of yogurt should be used to test if it is hygienic or not.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ethical Dilemma #7: Should companies give to charity?

Ethical Dilemma #1 - Nicotine in Beverages